September 29, 2021: Court Hearing

 I had a court hearing today.  Assistant State Attorney Kendall Davidson announced that in January 2022 he was going to take six months off so that he could participate in the "drop program."

Apparently Davidson is going to retire and he must take that time off before he can come back to work and get paid for working while, at the same time, collecting his retirement benefits from being an assistant state attorney. It will be interesting to see who the next corrupt assistant state attorney will be to take his place.

Personally I think that corrupt assistant state attorneys, such as Kendall Davidson, need to be fired and not given their retirement and then allowed to return to work while, at the same time, collecting those retirement benefits so they can continue in their corrupt ways. I feel sorry for the residents of Pinellas County, Florida who have to foot the bill for those retirement benefits and continue to pay the salary for a corrupt prosecutor.

Here is another interesting tidbit of information that I learned during that hearing.

I was initially evaluated by two psychologists for the State: Dr. Amy Swan and Dr. Karen Parker.

Amy Swan also evaluated another FCCC inmate years ago and he was committed. Committed FCCC inmates are entitled to an annual review to determine if they are safe to be released. In the past year or so Dr. Swan revaluated this inmate and changed her opinion, determining he was safe to be released.

Subsequently, this FCCC inmate was released by the same judge (Judge Paul Levine) that I have.

Now here is the kicker: Dr. Swan, changing her opinion in that other case, so upset and pissed off Bruce Bartlett, the State Attorney, and ASA Davidson that on September·29, 2021 Davidson announced in open court that he· is no longer using · Amy Swan as an expert, and will not be using her as an expert against me. ASA Davidson is now searching for another expert to replace Dr. Swan and who will do his bidding his way without question. This new hired gun will now have to evaluate me in order to take Dr. Swan's place in my case.

I believe that Dr. Swan would have reversed her opinion concerning me because of my age and medical issues. Thus, I believe, the reason Davidson has decided not to use her further in my case.

What more proof does a person need before they believe that Bartlett and Davidson are corrupt and are not interested in following the law unless it suits them?

Copyright © 2022 by Gary L. Perrot

All Rights Reserved.

Copying or reproduction by any means is strictly prohibited without the express written consent of Gary L. Perrot.